AI Replaces War as the Global Elite's Wealth Extraction Engine

The global elite are transitioning from a "forever war" model of wealth extraction to one centered on Artificial Intelligence (AI). This shift is driven by the convergence of the financial-industrial complex (FIC), military-industrial complex (MIC), and technical-industrial complex (TIC).

The Evolution of Wealth Extraction: From War to AI

Historically, the MIC was nationalistic and geographically constrained by its manufacturing base. However, the current trend is towards a fully technical approach, with AI being beta-tested in various conflict zones, notably accelerated by the Russia-Ukraine conflict. This technological evolution is becoming the new mechanism for wealth extraction.

The current economic climate, characterized by high energy prices and a diesel shortage, is a critical factor. Energy is a fundamental input for AI data centers. The FIC, which controls the "money printer," can create money at will, acquire assets at reduced prices, and collateralize these assets. This explains the highly concentrated ownership of the stock market, with 88% controlled by 10% of households, and 50% by the top 1% of those 10%.

As interest rates rise due to increasing oil prices, the FIC (bondholders and the Federal Reserve) demands higher rates for government debt. This impacts mortgages, credit card debt, and refinancing, compelling individuals to either leverage or sell their assets. These assets are then transferred to those who control the money supply. AI is not replacing the "forever war" machine but rather augmenting it as an additional tool for wealth extraction. The TIC acts as another vector to pressure individuals' wealth, forcing them into debt and asset sales, which are then acquired by the global elite.

Mechanisms of Wealth Transfer and Elite Control

The elite, through entities like BlackRock, manage vast amounts of assets. BlackRock's assets under management increased from $14 trillion to $15.3 trillion since the closure of the Strait of Hormuz. This growth is fueled by increased asset values, investments from wealthy individuals, and the continuous flow of pension contributions into the stock market.

Government debt, often spent on military contracts, boosts military share prices. Banks, particularly since the Strait of Hormuz closure, have seen their share prices rise, profiting from trading fees, mergers and acquisitions (concentrating small businesses into larger public companies), and increased market volatility.

Those who own AI infrastructure benefit significantly. While average individuals contribute to pensions, their wages do not keep pace with inflation, causing them to fall behind. Those with excess wealth can buy assets outside their 401k, leverage them, and access them before retirement, effectively "rigging the game."

AI is driving massive productivity increases, benefiting businesses, especially large corporations. While job data does not yet show widespread unemployment, the expectation is that jobs like taxi and truck drivers will be automated. This could lead to a future where many rely on universal basic income (UBI).

The current economic landscape presents a paradox: money printing causes inflation, but productivity increases from AI are disinflationary. This leads to asset price inflation, where AI ownership determines one's position on the wealth spectrum.

Aligned Incentives vs. Coordination

The idea of global elites coordinating a sinister plot is less accurate than understanding their aligned incentives. The financial system is codified to produce specific outcomes. For example, asset managers like BlackRock, with their extensive board seats and technology (like Aladdin), benefit from passive investment flows from pensions. They profit from market crashes through private equity, are simultaneously long and short through hedge funds, create money through banks (driving real estate bubbles), and financialize companies through investment banks. They are diversified across all outcomes, profiting regardless of market direction.

The dominance of bots in market trading, coupled with BlackRock's control over the largest AI database in financial markets, means everyone is scenario planning with similar data, allowing for front-running and data-driven trades. This eliminates the need for explicit coordination.

AI companies are currently raising significant capital, with high valuations driving them to seek debt financing even if they have free cash flow. This creates a competitive market for debt between corporate and government entities, pushing up interest rates globally. The FIC benefits from these higher yields through money market funds and from valuation increases in tech companies. They can also leverage companies with debt, and if those companies fail, larger entities like Apple or Amazon acquire them.

The Endgame: Ownership and Control

The phrase "you'll own nothing and be happy" reflects the elite's goal: "we'll own everything and keep you happy." This involves creating a compliant populace with optimal debt and pension contributions, who want the system to continue. Those who do not own assets and are frustrated with the system might be offered UBI, potentially pacifying them.

The surveillance state plays a role in maintaining control. By manufacturing civil unrest, the elite can push for increased surveillance, which the public, seeking safety, will accept. This desire for control is tied to wealth extraction, ensuring compliance to inflate assets and acquire them from those forced to sell.

The current system is characterized by peak centralization and concentration of wealth. While BlackRock might appear decentralized, it represents a structure that is more decentralized than previous empires.

The Role of Central Banks and Debt

The central bank system, designed to socialize losses and privatize gains, is crucial. Banks, not central banks, create money by issuing loans. The Federal Reserve, owned by banks, sets borrowing costs. The Fed's balance sheet can be used to boot banks out of the system, but ultimately, banks are the primary shareholders and receive dividends.

The government, with its bank account at the Fed, spends money (e.g., on war or social programs) that is managed by the FIC. This system ensures that banks profit from debt, regardless of whether it is capitalism or socialism. The Fed intervenes with quantitative easing during stress, but historically, the Treasury could issue its own currency (as Abraham Lincoln and JFK did). However, this is not done due to the intertwined nature of government and the MIC/FIC/TIC hierarchy, influenced by lobbying and corporate-sponsored think tanks.

The Dutch system, which created the central bank, stock market, and bond market, eventually led to government bankruptcy. This model transferred to the Bank of England and then to the American system. The removal of the gold standard in 1971 and the rise of the petrodollar in the 1970s shifted the game to rolling over debt.

The invention of the mortgage-backed security in the 1980s, coinciding with BlackRock's rise, provided a mechanism to continuously roll over debt. "Rolling over debt" means never paying back the principal, only the interest, and selling old debt to new investors. The dollar itself is debt, and paying it off would collapse the US economy.

The current strategy is "fiscal dominance," where the government spends continuously, rolling over debt, and pumping value into stocks and assets. This creates a K-shaped economy where the rich get richer and the poor get poorer.

Multipolar World and Geopolitical Shifts

The world is transitioning to a multipolar system. The US, as a MIC/FIC/TIC entity, is a regional power. China, with its government controlling its MIC/FIC/TIC, is another. Russia, part of the BRICS bloc, is aligned with China. Other regional powers are emerging, such as a potential conglomeration in the Middle East (Turkey, Pakistan, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Iran).

Historically, the FIC aimed to prevent alignment between China and Russia, keep Africa's resources subdued, and control Middle Eastern energy. This is now changing. China has the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), and ASEAN is another bloc. BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) has expanded to include Iran, UAE, Egypt, and Ethiopia, forming key nodes in these competing structures.

The Middle East is undergoing a power struggle, with countries like Iran negotiating control of strategic choke points. Iran's funding of militia groups has been a tactic to negotiate sanction relief, while its IRGC (Revolutionary Guard Corps) benefits from the status quo. China is a crucial player, buying energy from Iran and the Gulf, and investing across the region.

The FIC is adapting by building multipolar financial centers. BlackRock's head office is now in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, and UAE has an FX swap line to create dollars outside the Federal Reserve system. This decentralization of financial power is happening alongside the fiscal dominance and asset stripping that benefits the wealthy.

The current system's sustainability depends on the US economy's growth rate exceeding the average cost of its debt. If the average interest rate on the $40 trillion US debt (currently 3.3%) surpasses the growth rate (around 5%), the system becomes unsustainable, necessitating a managed transition. This drives a "grow at all costs" policy, even if it means sacrificing the dollar's world reserve currency status.

The Future of Conflict and Control

If the MIC cannot profit from the Middle East, it needs a new home, which appears to be Europe. Record investments are going into building European MIC nodes, suggesting an expectation of conflict. NATO is seen as a mechanism for pushing MIC profits, with calls for European nations to increase military spending.

Russia is seen as genuinely resisting the Western MIC. While Russia is an aggressor, there is a "marriage of convenience" among Russian elites who benefit from their own energy resources. The current conflicts are transferring wealth from borrowers to lenders and from energy consumers to producers.

Domestic terrorism and surveillance states are emerging as new profit centers for the MIC and TIC. The goal is to turn everyone into a subscription model through AI.

The "deep state" elements aim to maintain aggression with Russia to print more money and establish new MICs across Europe. This involves narratives that create strategic tension between competing ideologies (e.g., Europe as socialist vs. America as capitalist) to distract from how power truly operates.

Central and South America are also becoming new homes for MIC and TIC interests, with a re-emergence of countries aligning with Western interests, often through supporting dictatorships that are easier to control for economic warfare.

The US's actions, such as tariffs and sanctions, are seen as driving multipolarity. Trump's funding from entities like Elon Musk (TIC), the Mellon Banking family (FIC), and Gulf countries (via Affinity Partners) suggests an alignment with an agenda that benefits these powerful groups. The Gulf countries, for example, want Israel to continue its "war jig" as it benefits their interests.

The world is undergoing radical change, with the FIC building multi-polar financial centers and distributing wealth while simultaneously creating an asset-stripping environment. This K-shaped economy, where the rich get richer and the poor get poorer, is managed through socializing losses and privatizing gains during crises. The ultimate goal is to maintain this system until treasuries are no longer liquid, leading to a slow, managed transition.

Governments are implementing increasingly restrictive energy policies, particularly in Europe, where there is a continuous narrative of impending invasion. This narrative, if maintained, allows for the testing of new equipment, especially as traditional testing grounds in Palestine and Africa become less accessible. This necessitates finding new "homes" for such activities, with Central and South America emerging as key regions.

Geopolitical Shifts and Economic Warfare

There is a noticeable alignment of Central and South American countries with Western interests, though Brazil remains somewhat of an outlier. The recent first-round victory of Flávio Bolsonaro in Brazil suggests a swing to the right and potential alignment with the West. However, Brazil's continued membership in BRICS and its focus on energy resources indicate a complex geopolitical stance.

Western alignment often favors dictatorships over democracies because dictatorships allow for easier control of a small, corrupt elite. This makes regime change simpler if compliance falters, enabling the exploitation of resources for external benefit rather than for the country's people. Democracies, in contrast, are harder to manage, often requiring covert operations and "color revolutions."

Economic warfare, particularly through currency manipulation, is a key strategy. By persuading countries to print more currency, inflation is induced, which disproportionately harms the general population while insulating elites. For example, in Iran, the IRGC demands dollars and yen, making them somewhat immune to the destruction of the Iranian rial, which devastates the savings of ordinary citizens.

Oman has become a crucial node for Iran's dollar laundering and sanction circumvention. While banks in Turkey and Egypt have faced sanctions, Oman has remained untouched, with dollars continuing to flow through its central bank to Iran's.

Trump, Multipolarity, and Regional Dynamics

Trump's actions, such as imposing tariffs and withdrawing from the Iran nuclear deal, were aimed at fostering multipolarity. This aligns with the interests of various powerful entities:

• The "Tick" (Technology-Industrial Complex): Desires a global surveillance state.
• The "Fick" (Financial-Industrial Complex): Seeks multipolarity with diverse financial centers.
• The "Mick" (Military-Industrial Complex): Benefits from increased conflict and war.
• Gulf Countries: Aim for Iran to cease funding militia groups, maintain relationships with the Fick (due to sovereign wealth fund partnerships), integrate Iran into a regional order, and establish regional defense pacts independent of US military bases.

Trump's funding sources, including Elon Musk (Tick), the Mellon Banking family (Fick), and entities connected to Israel (Mick), suggest a complex web of interests. Israel, described as a "Mick jurisdiction," is reportedly privatizing its military companies, with significant investments from Gulf countries through funds like Affinity Partners. This suggests a convergence of interests where Gulf countries, normalized with Iran via China, seek a contained Iran and new security agreements, while Israel benefits from continued conflict.

Iran is gradually integrating into a regional order, albeit slower than anticipated, with China playing a facilitating role. Historically funded groups in Lebanon, Yemen, and Iraq are increasingly integrating into state power. The seemingly easy leadership change in Syria, where a former ISIS member is now working towards regional stability, is seen as a strategic move allowed by Russia, Iran, and China to control the route for weapons and funding to Hezbollah.

Multipolarity and Individual Sovereignty

Multipolarity is seen as beneficial, as competition can hold regional powers in check, despite the potential for increased conflict. A global hegemon has historically been destructive.

Individual sovereignty is crucial in a world shaped by these geopolitical and economic shifts. This involves:

1. Understanding the Macro: Disregarding political rhetoric and media propaganda, and instead observing the flow of money to understand global realities.
2. Controlling the Self: Focusing on personal jurisdiction, including one's mind, body, and spirit. This means questioning ingrained ideologies and narratives, and moving beyond divisive rhetoric.
3. Financial Sovereignty:
   • Spend less than you earn, invest the difference in assets. This is a simple but difficult rule.
   • Prioritize asset ownership. Even if deeply in debt, investing in assets (e.g., $100/month) over debt repayment is suggested to avoid being relegated to a universal basic income system.
   • Hold wealth outside the system. This includes physical assets like gold (acknowledging the challenges of securing it independently) and cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, especially by owning one's keys rather than relying on ETFs.
   • Resist the control grid. This extends to data, identity, and even personal AI models, by running them locally.

A future where programmable money and social credit scores could lead to complete control is a concern, where individuals "own nothing and be happy" if they comply, but face consequences if they become a threat.

Impending Crises and Opportunities

Crises are inevitable, serving to "socialize losses and privatize gains." Potential crises include:

• Commodities Market: A "rug pull" could occur as China owns commodities without paper, while the West holds paper without sufficient commodity backing.
• Currency Markets: The dollar could be weakened to manage capital outflows, forcing Federal Reserve intervention.
• Stock Market: The AI trade, with its high valuations, could experience a massive correction, leading to socialized losses and privatized gains, and further government debt.

To navigate these challenges, individuals must be prepared for such scenarios by consistently building and diversifying their assets, including those outside the traditional financial system.

Despite the challenging global outlook, a radically optimistic mindset is important. While empires rise and fall, and corruption is cyclical, there are opportunities for positive change, such as African nations building their own industries, the potential end of the "forever war" in the Middle East, and the rise of digital resistance against surveillance states. The key is to focus on what one can control: oneself, one's family, and one's community, and to continuously strive for greater sovereignty in wealth, data, and mind.

Where to Follow

• X (Twitter): @SimonDixon
• YouTube: Simon Dixon 21 (live every Friday)
• Website: simondixon.com (decentralized, self-hosted environment)